Ohio firm sues a former employee for $3,000 over a training repayment clause tied to basic onboarding videos and PDFs: ‘This cannot be how the system is supposed to work’

Advertisement
  • Man with glasses holds his head in frustration while sitting at a laptop indoors.
  • Look I need to rant because my head is about to explode over this nonsense. I worked at this mid-level marketing
  • firm for exactly four months. The pay was garbage and the boss was a tyrant so I gave my two weeks notice and thought I was finally free.
  • but then yesterday I get a registered letter in the mail from their corporate legal team. Apparently when I
  • started they had me sign a Training Repayment Agreement buried in a sixty page stack of onboarding
  • paperwork. Now they are claiming I owe them three thousand dollars for specialized professional
  • Man sits at a laptop at night, holding a phone to his ear with a serious expression.
  • training that I received. Do you know what this training actually was. There
  • was no certification. No actual teacher. The whole thing was ABSOLUTELY just a series of pre-recorded three minute
  • zoom videos from 2018 about how to use the company printer and a PDF on how to not harass your coworkers. That is it.
  • I spent all night researching these TRAPS and apparently they are actually legal in my state as long as they are written a certain way. It feels
  • like a legalized hostage situation. How can a court look at a thirty dollar printer
  • tutorial and decide it is worth a month of my rent. If I knew they were going to charge
  • me to learn where the breakroom is I would of just stayed unemployed.
  • This cannot be how the system is supposed to work. Why is this even a thing.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article